Sailmakers

Quote: Originally posted by Doug Farrand on 19 September 2002

---

This may be the start of a religous debate...

---

Yep, you're right...this is not 'Catholic'

Quote: Originally posted by Doug Farrand on 19 September 2002

---

Who makes the best sails for a Laser28?

Which sailmaker has provided you with the best/worst service?

---

I guess to some extent these 2 questions can be answered together. I'll hold back on my opinion but give you some food for thought.

• If the basis for the question is speed, then I might answer (for the sake of arguement) there has not been a huge difference in top speed in a given condition...yet there has been huge differences in how you get there.
• Some sailmakers have their sails in such a way that there is less adjusting needed, or sometimes referred to as 'changing geers'. Achieving top speed comes with less fuss and more straightforward adjustments.
• Some sailmakers have also made the mast tuning relatively easy. While it can be argued that you can constantly make adjustments to the spar to optimise for the conditions, we have found sailmakers that have kept the tuning to an understandable science with a base setting that responds very well in all conditions.
• You could also argue that the best sailmaker is the one that gives you the best service and support.

Quote: Originally posted by Doug Farrand on 19 September 2002

---

What are the pro's and con's of Class sails vs. PHRF optimized construction?

---

I have yet to see a PHRF 'optimised' sail that is faster than the one design sails. That said, the 2 areas people have exploited for PHRF are;

• more favourable rating because of changes in sail design and/or size
• use of different materials premissed on either longer life and/or more durability

As I mentioned, since none of these sails in my opinion are actually faster than one design sails, it is really a cost/benefit situation that has yet to be clearly demonstrated in favour of PHRF designs.

Quote: Originally posted by Doug Farrand on 19 September 2002

---

Bolt rope or mast slides for the main?

---

For racing I think there is no question that a bolt rope is preferable.

Quote: Originally posted by Doug Farrand on 19 September 2002

---

 Who is D&B?

---

DB Sails were marketted by Denise Bienvenu.

Quote: Originally posted by Doug Farrand on 19 September 2002

---

I plan to add a new main and genoa next season. Any suggestions?

---

I won't make any suggestions on the brand, instead I offer food for thought;

• Buy one design sails. By going this route you will have the most options for regattas and there is nothing faster.
• One design sails are the best value.

If you sail against Jet, who uses North Sails, and Rags, who uses Doyle Sails ( though recently some are not class) you will be able to sparr against 2 fast boats in your area. Better still is if you come to CORK where you can sail against the rest of us and many boats using Quantum Sails.

If you get your boat speed up to par with the top of the fleet at CORK, you will be sailing the boat at its potential and once at this level, you will also do well in PHRF!

Of course all of this is just my opinion, but after sailing the boat since the prototype, having done plenty of PHRF racing and a lot of MORC racing with all sorts of changes in search of the best rating (23.6 was our lowest)...these are my humble thoughts.

Cheers...and good sailing

Quote: Originally posted by Chris Ladd on 20 September 2002

---

1. Add a light air Genoa- have it built with LOTS of luff curve.

2. Add a 0.5 oz Running Kite

---

Good points Chris

Cheers,

Doug,

The class kite needs a full length pole... Now for PHRF I have gone another 4 inches longer (with wider kites) and taken a further penality.  If you are going to race some OD then I would say go with the class size pole.

Is your running kite full width?

One more thought... I have  had good success running a Blast Reacher/ Code Zero in PHRF (works great for cruising as well). Check to see if your sailmaker guy can cut up an old .75 oz chute. No penalities yet for running this configuration here,  but the mid girth must be 75% of the foot.

Quote: Originally posted by Chris Ladd on 20 September 2002

---

The class kite needs a full length pole... Now for PHRF I have gone another 4 inches longer (with wider kites) and taken a further penality. 

---

This is an interesting point Chris. In the sailing we have done, we have never found an actual benefit by using a shorter spinaker pole and smaller chute. Given the ratings advantage versus the loss in performance, you're better off staying with stock size. It's interesting you are even going beyond that .

Cheers,